Alisa Kummel vs Izabela Heinzova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kummel vs Heinzova analysis and find out who is favored!
Alisa Kummel vs Izabela Heinzova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kummel 1 - 0 Heinzova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kummel has won 49.33% of points on their second serve, while Heinzova has won 38.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kummel, in recent form, has won 54.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Heinzova has won 47.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.01% and 37.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kummel has saved 54.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heinzova has saved 57.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kummel has won 71.93% of matches played (W/L 41/ 16), with Heinzova winning 53.57% (W/L 15/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kummel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9). Heinzova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kummel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72% of matches (W/L 36/ 14), where as Heinzova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 11/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kummel winning 1 times and Heinzova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kummel winning 2 and Heinzova winning 0. The last match between Kummel and Heinzova was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 16-11-2023, Second, Hard with Alisa Kummel getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kummel and Heinzova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kummel winning 0 times and Heinzova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kummel winning 0, and Heinzova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kummel has played against opponents with an average rank of 146.89 while Heinzova has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kummel has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heinzova has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kummel has converted 52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heinzova has converted 46.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Alisa Kummel
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
784
Rank
783
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
Izabela Heinzova
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
56% (64-51)
Career Total W/L
42% (26-36)
62% (8-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Alisa Kummel | Izabela Heinzova |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (42/60) | 46% (32/70) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (29/42) | 63% (20/32) |
2nd Serve Win% | 33% (6/18) | 34% (13/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 33% (3/9) |
Return Points W% | 53% (37/70) | 42% (25/60) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Alisa Kummel
Player
Izabela Heinzova
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
70)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Alisa Kummel | Izabela Heinzova |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 61% (17/11) | 0% (0/2) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (133/109) | 0% (0/7) |
Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.33 |
Aces Total | 11 | 1 |
DFs per game | 0.27 | 1.33 |
DFs Total | 32 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:41 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 229.54 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (569/832) | 56% (20/36) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (340/569) | 45% (9/20) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (124/263) | 31% (5/16) |
BPs Won% Total | 52% (56/107) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (364/754) | 36% (10/28) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Alisa Kummel Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Valeriya Yushchenko
Player
Alisa Kummel
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alisa Kummel
Player
Soha Sadiq
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alisa Kummel
Player
Daria Shubina
83%
(
68 of
82)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Valeriya Yushchenko
Player
Alisa Kummel
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
82%
(
32 of
39)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alisa Kummel
Player
Haine Ogata
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alisa Kummel
Player
Eva Korysheva
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sandra Samir
Player
Alisa Kummel
51%
(
50 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alisa Kummel
Player
Briana Szabo
69%
(
77 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
47 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alisa Kummel
Player
Emma Tothova
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Alisa Kummel
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Izabela Heinzova Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Izabela Heinzova
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
10 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
40
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Daria Zelinskaya
Player
Izabela Heinzova
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
44%
(
26 of
59)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 2-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Fang An Lin
Player
Izabela Heinzova
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 2-6 6-1 11-9 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Evgeniya Burdina
Player
Izabela Heinzova
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
11
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Alisa Kummel
Player
Izabela Heinzova
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
70)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Izabela Heinzova
Player
Ju-Yun Jeng
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more